Opportunities for Virtual Care in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Real-World Dietary Therapy Practice

Introduction: Dietary therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an effective first-line treatment aimed at identifying triggers by systematically removing then reintroducing food groups. Success on diet therapy can be augmented by working with a dietitian, but this is not a universal clinical resource. Virtual or telehealth approaches to nutrition care may offer opportunities to implement diet therapy for EoE. We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary center with six GI dietitians to compare real-world standard in-person versus virtual EoE nutrition practices in terms of access, follow-up< and disease control. Method(s): We identified adults with EoE referred to GI nutrition through query of the electronic medical record by ICD-10 diagnoses and confirmed by chart review. As all nutrition visits prior to the COVID pandemic were performed in-person, standard care was defined as care established in January-December 2019 and virtual care in January-December 2021. Associations were analyzed using Chi-squared and Student's t test (Table). Result(s): A total of 204 patients were included;99 referred for standard in-person and 105 virtual nutrition care. The cohorts did not differ significantly by gender, age at the time of referral, race, and distance lived to our center. Of these, 55.6% (55) standard and 48.6% (51) virtual visits were completed with a dietitian (p=0.341) and 4-food elimination diet was the most commonly planned diet. The majority initiated the diet (80.0% standard, 78.4% virtual, p=0.842) and among them, half successfully attained histologic remission with the elimination phase (63.6% standard, 47.5% virtual, p=0.324). Ultimate treatments plans included remaining on dietary therapy (25.5% standard, 23.5% virtual, p=0.728), no treatment or lost to follow-up (34.6% standard, 25.5% virtual), and medication (25.5% standard, 41.2% virtual). Conclusion(s): There is a growing demand for nutrition care in EoE and in our tertiary practice, we found no differences in the success and response rate on elimination diet or follow-up between patients receiving standard or virtual nutrition care. Virtual approaches to implementing EoE dietary therapy may serve to complement in-person care and offer opportunities for those lacking local dietitian access. However, up to one-third of patients are lost to follow-up or remain untreated, also highlighting a need to identify, understand, and overcome barriers to treatment uptake and disease control .

A 2-week course of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition followed by the Crohn Disease Exclusion Diet is effective for Induction and Maintenance of Remission in children with Crohn Disease;the DIETOMICS-CD trial

Background: Exclusive enteral Nutrition (EEN) is considered a first line therapy for children with active Crohn disease (CD). CD Exclusion Diet (CDED)+Partial Enteral Nutrition (PEN) is effective for induction of remission in mild-moderate CD at weeks 6 and 12, with better tolerance than EEN. We assessed whether a 2-week course of EEN, followed by CDED+PEN is superior to 8 weeks of EEN in sustaining clinical remission at week 14, outcomes of CDED up to 24 weeks, and the utility of CDED in mild-severe CD. Method(s): This international, multicenter, randomized-controlled trial compared 2 weeks of EEN (Modulen, Nestle Health Science) followed by 3 phases of the CDED+PEN to 8 weeks of EEN, followed by PEN with free diet, both up to week 24. Children aged 8-18 with CD<3 years, mild-severe disease [paediatric CD activity index (PCDAI) 15-47.5], and active inflammation [elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or faecal calprotectin (FCP)] were included. Stable immunomodulator (IM) treatment was allowed. Naive patients were allowed to start an IM from week 4. Result(s): Of the 63 eligible patients enrolled, 55 were randomized and included in the final intention to treat analysis (target recruitment failed due to COVID);Group 1 (CDED+PEN;29) and group 2 (EEN;26), mean age 12.7+/-2.4. Steroids-free sustained remission at week 14 was obtained in 20/29(69%) in group 1 and 16/26(61.5%) in group 2, p=0.56. Remission at week 8 was obtained in 22/29(76%) in group 1 and 14/26(54%) in group 2, p=0.08. 16/29(55%) in group 1 and 9/26(34%) in group 2 maintained clinical remission at week 24;p=0.12. Median PCDAI declined from 32.5[20-36.2] to 2.5[0-5.6] and 1.2[0-5.6] in group 1 (p<0.001 for all), and from 22.5[20-29.3] to 0[0-4.3] and 0[0-2.5] in group 2 (p<0.005 for all) at baseline, week 8 and 14 respectively. Median CRP improved in group 1 from 32 mg/L[6-69] to 5[2-16] and 3[2-10.1] (p<0.001 for both) and in group 2 from 10.35 mg/L[5-33] to 3.7[2.2-7.2], p=0.012 and 3.2[2.8-5], p=0.006 at baseline, week 8 and 14 respectively. Median FCP declined in group 1 from 1946 mug/g [862-3304] to 802[196-1312] at week 8 and 241[82-1175] at week 14 (p<0.01 for both), and in group 2 from 1615[605-2692] at baseline to 436[252-1389] at week 8, which then increased to 731[349-1305] at week 14 (p<0.01 for both). At week 14, 12/22(54%) received IM from group 1 and 15/16(93%) from group 2;p= 0.009. Conclusion(s): Two weeks of EEN followed by CDED&lPEN and EEN were successful in induction of clinical and biochemical remission in mild-severe paediatric CD, and most CDED+PEN patients-maintained remission to 24 weeks. Sustained clinical remission at week 14 was similar despite higher IM use in the EEN Group, suggesting that CDED might prevents diet-induced inflammation regardless of IM use.

Eosinophilic Oesophagitis in Children: A Single Uk Tertiary Centre Experience

The incidence of Eosinophilic Oesophagitis (EoE) is increasing worldwide in the paediatric population. Management of these children is complex, and includes elimination diet (2/4/6 food), steroids etc. It is recommended to perform endoscopies between each reintroduction to assess disease activity. In our centre dietary exclusion is the standard practice. Since 2019 we follow a step-up approach with regards to elimination diet starting with 2 food exclusion diet (FED) and building up as required. Food is reintroduced gradually with significant dietetic support and proactive monitoring including endoscopy. Objectives We looked at the outcomes of children with EoE referred to Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust from Kent and East Sussex. Methods Retrospective review of case notes of paediatric patients diagnosed with EoE between January 2015 and December 2020. Data collected included symptoms, endoscopy findings and histology at diagnosis and compared the same after dietary intervention. Results 21 patients were diagnosed with EoE between January 2015 and December 2020 between 5-16 yrs Median age at diagnosis 11years. Frequently seen in boys (65%). Dysphagia was the predominant symptom (76%) followed by vomiting (60%), abdominal pain (50%), and choking (20%). Features of EoE were seen during endoscopy in 71% and oesophagus looked endoscopically normal in 29% of patients. Diagnosis was made on eosinophil count as per ESPGHAN guidance. The frequency and timing of repeat endoscopies following dietary intervention varied due to a multitude of factors including COVID-19 restrictions (between 4-9 months median 4 months). Histological remission (Eosinophils <15 pHPF) was achieved in 15/21 (70%) of patients. 7/10 children on 2FED, 3/3 patients on 4FED and 5/5 children on 6FED achieved histological resolution. The 6FED group took significantly longer to identify the causative food, establish long term dietary management and required more endoscopies. Food was reintroduced gradually on an individual basis with the aim of introducing back all food groups. 13/15 continue to be on milk free diet, 5/15 remain on milk and wheat free diet, 1/15 on soya and egg free diet and the other patient remains on 4FED (parental choice). 2 patients have started steroids due to on-going symptoms findings on surveillance endoscopy and histological following re-introduction. Summary and Conclusion Dysphagia was the predominant symptom in our cohort of patients. Furrowing and oedema was the major finding during endoscopy. With dietary exclusion endoscopic resolution was seen in 62% and histological resolution seen in 70% of patients at first surveillance endoscopy. Re-introduction continues to remains a major challenge and we have not been able to introduce all the food groups in any of our patients due to either symptoms or recurrence on endoscopy/histology.

Duodenal Stricture as a Rare, Possible Complication of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease (Egid)

EGID is a recently described condition with an unknown etiology and pathogenesis. There are three case reports of duodenal stricture associated with EGID: one in an adult requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy due to the suspicion of malignancy and 2 cases in a child and a young adult, who responded to oral steroids. We report the case of a 10-year-old who presented to A&E with a 9-month history of epigastric abdominal pain and 1 episode of haematemesis, on a background of asthma. He was treated for Helicobacter pylori, based on a positive stool antigen. Abdominal pain and vomiting persisted, therefore an oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) was performed. This identified widespread white plaques throughout the oesophagus, erythema and nodularity of the gastric antrum and white nodules in the first part of the duodenum. Histology revealed changes of EGID and eosinophilic oesophagitis (EOE) and patient was commenced on Montelukast, oral viscous Budesonide (OVB), Cetirizine and continued proton pump inhibitor (PPI). After the allergy workup identified house dust mites, cat sensitisation and fish allergy, a 6-food elimination diet was initiated. During the next 2 years, symptoms subsided, and endoscopy changes improved, with only mild signs of active EOE while on OVB, PPI and diary/egg/fish free diet. However, the patient relapsed due to poor compliance to treatment. He became more unwell during the Covid pandemic with recurrent vomiting and static weight. A trial of dupilumab was considered, however his reassessment OGD had to be delayed due to restricted access to theatre. He was treated empirically with a reducing course of oral prednisolone, with temporary response. The endoscopic assessment performed subsequently showed erythema, erosions and white plaques in the distal oesophagus and gastric antrum with narrowing between the first and the second part of the duodenum (D2), that could not be entered. Histology identified mild upper oesophagitis (4 eosinophils (eos)/HPF), active middle and lower oesophagitis (20 eos/HPF and 12 eos/HPF, respectively), chronic gastritis (80 eos/HPF) and nonspecific reactive changes of the proximal duodenum. A barium meal confirmed a duodenal stricture. At this stage, we recommended a sloppy diet and a second weaning course of oral prednisolone, along with Montelukast. He was subsequently commenced on azathioprine for maintenance of remission. A repeat barium study and small bowel MRI performed post course of steroids and on azathioprine revealed stable appearances of the proximal duodenal stricture, excluding the presence of further strictures. While the patient has responded to the course of oral steroids and azathioprine, a repeat upper GI endoscopy is currently planned to dilate the duodenal stricture. The challenges posed by this case were the rarity of the condition, limited treatment options and access to endoscopy during the Covid pandemic and the fact that unlike previous case reports a sustained remission could not be obtained on steroids, and a maintenance immunosuppressive medication was required. We can conclude that this subgroup of patients should be monitored closely for signs of bowel obstruction and will require more intense treatment, including immunomodulators, endoscopic dilatation and or surgery.

EOSINOPHILIC OESOPHAGITIS IN CHILDREN: A SINGLE UK TERTIARY CENTRE EXPERIENCE

The incidence of Eosinophilic Oesophagitis (EoE) is increasing worldwide in the paediatric population. Management of these children is complex, and includes elimination diet (2/4/ 6 food), steroids etc. It is recommendedto perform endoscopies between each reintroduction to assessdisease activity. In our centre dietary exclusion is the standard practice. Since 2019 we follow a step-up approach with regards to elimination diet starting with 2 food exclusion diet (FED) and building up as required. Food is reintroduced gradually with significant dietetic support and proactive monitoring including endoscopy. Objectives: We looked at the outcomes of children with EoE referred to Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust from Kent and East Sussex. Methods: Retrospective review of case notes of paediatric patients diagnosed with EoE between January 2015 and December 2020. Data collected included symptoms, endoscopy findings and histology at diagnosis and compared the same after dietary intervention. Results 21 patients were diagnosed with EoE between January 2015 and December 2020 between 5-16 yrs Median age at diagnosis 11years. Frequently seen in boys (65%). Dysphagiawas the predominant symptom (76%) followed by vomiting (60%), abdominal pain (50%), and choking (20%). Features of EoE were seen during endoscopy in 71% and oesophagus looked endoscopically normal in 29% of patients. Diagnosis was made on eosinophil count as per ESPGHAN guidance. The frequency and timing of repeat endoscopies following dietary intervention varied due to a multitude of factors including COVID-19 restrictions (between 4-9 months median 4 months). Histological remission (Eosinophils <15 pHPF) was achieved in 15/21 (70%) of patients. 7/10 children on 2FED, 3/3 patients on 4FED and 5/5 children on 6FEDachieved histological resolution. The 6FED group took significantly longer to identify the causative food, establish long term dietary management and required more endoscopies. Food was reintroduced gradually on an individual basis with the aim of introducing back all food groups. 13/15 continue to be on milk free diet, 5/15 remain on milk and wheat free diet, 1/15 on soya and egg free diet and the other patient remains on 4FED (parental choice). 2 patients have started steroids due to on-going symptoms findings on surveillance endoscopy and histological following reintroduction. Summary and Conclusion Dysphagia was the predominant symptom in our cohort of patients. Furrowing and oedema was the major finding duringendoscopy. With dietary exclusion endoscopic resolution was seen in 62% and histological resolution seen in 70% of patients at first surveillance endoscopy. Re-introduction continues to remains a major challenge and we have not been able to introduce all the food groups in any of our patients due to either symptoms or recurrence on endoscopy/histology.

WORSENED FIBROSTENOTIC OUTCOMES IN EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS PATIENTS DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED ENDOSCOPY CANCELLATIONS

Background: Although there is ongoing research into the effects of COVID-19 infection in patients with EoE, the non-infection-related impact of COVID-19 is not known. In particular, the impact of postponing endoscopy due to the pandemic has not been studied. Aim: To determine the impact of COVID-19-related endoscopy cancellations on clinical outcomes in EoE patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified adult patients with a diagnosis of EoE who had a routine endoscopy scheduled from mid-March 2020 to May 2020, the timeframe at the beginning of the pandemic when most procedures were stopped at our center. We determined if procedures were cancelled or proceeded, and if canceled, we determined which patients were rescheduled and returned. We extracted clinical, endoscopic, and histologic for the last procedure completed prior to the pandemic, and well as the next procedure performed during the pandemic, if a patient returned. Outcomes included histologic response (<15 eos/hpf), endoscopic severity (EREFS), and global symptoms response. Patients who had delayed care were compared to those who returned as scheduled. Results: Of 102 patients with an endoscopy scheduled within our time frame, 27 had the planned procedure and 75 were cancelled. Of these 75, 20 (27%) never returned for their EGD despite attempts to contact them. When compared to those who were cancelled, those who underwent their procedure had more severe fibrosis (predilation esophageal diameter 13.6 vs 15.1mm;p=0.04) and were more commonly treated with an elimination diet (56% vs 33%;p=0.04);the remainder of clinical features were similar (Table 1). For the 55 patients who were canceled but ultimately returned for their EGD, the mean time between procedures was 1.1±0.7 years. While treatment rates and endoscopic features were similar between the pre- and delayed post-COVID EGD, more patients required a dilation after their return (71% vs 58%;p=0.05) and their esophageal diameter had significantly decreased from the size achieved at the prior procedure (16.8mm to 15.0mm;p<0.001) (Table 2). Of 17 individuals who did not have stricture, narrowing, or dilation pre-pandemic, during their next endoscopy 5 (29%) had a stricture, 1 (6%) had a narrowing, and 7 (41%) required dilation. Conclusion: A large number of EoE patients had their endoscopies cancelled during the initial part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those who were not cancelled had more severe fibrostenosis. Greater than 25% of those cancelled never returned for care, which is an unmeasured impact of the pandemic, and it is uncertain whether EoE findings have worsened in this group. Of those who returned, there was a delay of greater than one year, associated with progression of some fibrotic features and an increased need for esophageal dilation. (Table Presented) (Table Presented)